MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2059880774 · doi:10.1139/g00-048

Copepod development rates in relation to genome size and 18S rDNA copy number

2000· article· en· W2059880774 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.
venuePublished in a venue whose home country is Canada.

Bibliographic record

VenueGenome · 2000
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicNuclear Structure and Function
Canadian institutionsDalhousie University
FundersDalhousie University
KeywordsBiologyGenome sizeCopepodGenomeRibosomal RNAGeneEvolutionary biologyGeneticsDNASomatic cellCrustaceanZoology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

It is known that body sizes and temperature-independent developmental durations within two genera of calanoid Copepoda (Crustacea) are positively related to nuclear DNA contents of their somatic nuclei. Evidently because of the constraint of similar cell numbers among the species, (nucleotypic) effects of nucleus size on cell size and on cell-level processes are expressed at the whole-organism level. Here, we show that developmental durations of eight species of five genera are also negatively related to their greatly differing numbers of 18S rRNA genes per unit DNA. We propose that levels of rDNA iteration among copepods have been controlled by natural selection to regulate ribosome concentrations, therefore protein production and development rates, independently of the large variations in genome sizes, which are in turn adapted to regulating cell and therefore body sizes.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.978
Threshold uncertainty score0.653

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.215
Teacher spread0.210 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it