MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2059929422 · doi:10.1038/srep00894

Architecture of the HCN selectivity filter and control of cation permeation

2012· article· en· W2059929422 on OpenAlexafffund
Vincenzo Macri, Damiano Angoli, Eric A. Accili

Bibliographic record

VenueScientific Reports · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicIon channel regulation and function
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
FundersMichael Smith Health Research BCCanadian Institutes of Health ResearchHeart and Stroke Foundation of British Columbia and YukonHeart and Stroke Foundation of Canada
KeywordsSelectivityPotassium channelChemistryCysteineBiophysicsVoltage-gated potassium channelThreoninePermeationBinding sitePotassiumSerineBiochemistryBiologyPhosphorylationMembraneOrganic chemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Hyperpolarization-activated Cyclic Nucleotide-modulated (HCN) channels are similar in structure and function to voltage-gated potassium channels. Sequence similarity and functional analyses suggest that the HCN pore is potassium channel-like, consisting of a selectivity filter and an activation gate at the outer and inner ends, respectively. In GYG-containing potassium channels, the selectivity filter sequence is 'T/S-V/I/L/T-GYG', forming a row of four binding sites through which potassium ions flow. In HCNs, the equivalent residues are 'C-I-GYG', but whether they also form four cation binding sites is not known. Here, we focus on the anomalous filter residue of HCNs, the cysteine located at the inner side of the selectivity filter. In potassium channels, this position is occupied by threonine or serine and forms the fourth and most internal ion binding site of the selectivity filter. We find that this cysteine in HCNs does not contribute to permeation or form a fourth binding site.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.217
Teacher spread0.210 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations15
Published2012
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueScientific ReportsSame topicIon channel regulation and functionFrench-language works237,207