MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2059955650 · doi:10.1080/10511970408984093

A SIMPLIFIED TREATMENT OF BROWNIAN MOTION AND STOCHASTIC DIFFERENTIAL EQUATIONS ARISING IN FINANCIAL MATHEMATICS

2004· article· en· W2059955650 on OpenAlexaff
Mahmut Parlar

Bibliographic record

VenuePRIMUS · 2004
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEconomics, Econometrics and Finance
TopicComplex Systems and Time Series Analysis
Canadian institutionsMcMaster University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGeometric Brownian motionMathematicsBrownian motionStochastic differential equationBrownian excursionDiffusion processMathematical financeStochastic processReflected Brownian motionMathematical analysisApplied mathematicsMathematical economicsComputer scienceFinanceEconomicsStatistics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

ABSTRACT Brownian motion is an important stochastic process used in modelling the random evolution of stock prices. In their 1973 seminal paper—which led to the awarding of the 1997 Nobel prize in Economic Sciences—Fischer Black and Myron Scholes assumed that the random stock price process is described (i.e., generated) by Brownian motion. Despite its relative simplicity, the description of Brownian motion in advanced textbooks sometimes lacks an intuitive basis. The present exposition attempts to provide a simplified construction of standard Brownian motion based on a gambling analogy. This is followed by a description and explicit solution of two stochastic differential equations (known as arithmetic and geometric Brownian motion processes) that are driven by the standard Brownian motion process. The paper also illustrates the use of the Maple computer algebra system to simulate the standard and geometric Brownian motion processes.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.416
Threshold uncertainty score0.348

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.038
GPT teacher head0.223
Teacher spread0.185 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2004
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePRIMUSSame topicComplex Systems and Time Series AnalysisFrench-language works237,207