MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2059987832 · doi:10.1021/ja0017817

Transferred<sup>13</sup>C<i>T</i><sub>1</sub>Relaxation at Natural Isotopic Abundance:  A Practical Method for Determining Site-Specific Changes in Ligand Flexibility upon Binding to a Macromolecule

2000· article· en· W2059987832 on OpenAlexaff
Steven R. LaPlante, Norman Aubry, Robert Déziel, Feng Ni, Ping Xu

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of the American Chemical Society · 2000
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicHepatitis C virus research
Canadian institutionsBiotechnology Research InstituteBoehringer Ingelheim (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsChemistryRelaxation (psychology)Ligand (biochemistry)MacromoleculeSpin–lattice relaxationMolecular dynamicsChemical physicsNuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopyComputational chemistryProteaseCrystallographyStereochemistryProtonOrganic chemistryEnzymePhysicsBiochemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

An NMR strategy is described for measuring changes in 13 C spin−lattice relaxation times ( T 1 ) of ligand molecules, at natural isotopic abundance, upon binding to macromolecules of potentially unlimited size. The rapidly reversible binding nature of a substrate-based inhibitor (BILN127SE, K i = 5.4 μM) with the NS3 protease domain of the hepatitis C virus has been well documented and has served as an appropriate system for testing the transferred 13 C T 1 concept. 13 C T 1 relaxation, which is sensitive to motions that occur on the pico- to nanosecond time scale, were first measured for free BILN127SE. Upon addition of the protease at a 25:1 inhibitor-to-protease ratio, differential changes in the 13 C T 1 relaxation times of BILN127SE were observed. The equilibrium binding nature of the complex, results in a transfer of T 1 relaxation information of the ligand from the bound to the free state where it is more easily detected. The relative changes in 13 C T 1 relaxation provides a qualitative insight into the site-specific changes in ligand immobilization upon binding to the protease. Comparisons of this dynamics information are made with structural data deduced from 1 H NOESY, line-broadening, J -coupling, and ROESY experiments. The combination of dynamics and structural information should provide medicinal chemists with further opportunities to design more potent, chemically rigidified inhibitors.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.007

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.034
GPT teacher head0.358
Teacher spread0.324 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations31
Published2000
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of the American Chemical SocietySame topicHepatitis C virus researchFrench-language works237,207