Assessment of International Standards for Safe Exploration, Production and Transportation of Oil and Gas in the Barents Sea
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract In 2007, Norwegian Foreign Minister Jonas Gahr Store initiated the " Barents 2020" project - a joint Norwegian-Russian project dedicated to establishing acceptable health, environmental protection and safety standards in the Barents Sea. Russia's experience of operations in harsh climate regions and Norwegian expertise in the field of offshore operations has resulted in the successful implementation of the project on the harmonization of standards for environmental protection and safety in a vulnerable Barents Sea. Cooperation continues and is now entering a new phase with the aim of preparing industry guidelines for selected topics not only for the Barents Sea, but also with a pan-arctic perspective. The main sponsors of the project are now Gazprom, Statoil, ENI, Total, Shtokman Development AG (SDAG), the Oil and Gas Producers Association (OGP) and Det Norske Veritas (DNV). The project is to be completed by December 2011. The main objective of this paper is to summarize the current findings and recommendations from the various expert groups involved in the project. Abbreviations In this report the following abbreviations are frequently referred to:API - American Petroleum InstituteCSA - Canadian Standards AssociationDIS - Draft International StandardDNV - Det Norske VeritasEER - Escape, Evacuation, and RescueHSE - Health Safety and EnvironmentIMO - International Maritime OrganisationISO - International Organisation for StandardizationMARPOL - International Convention for the Prevention of Pollution from ShipsNORSOK - Norwegian offshore Petroleum Industry StandardOGP - International Association of Oil and Gas ProducersRP - Recommended PracticeWG - Working Group Conclusive Summary The purpose of the Barents2020 project is to recommend HSE standards for common Norwegian - Russian application in the Barents Sea, for safeguarding people, environment and asset values in connection with oil and gas activities, including marine transportation. The underlying assumption is that petroleum operations in the Barents Sea should be at least as safe as those in the North Sea. Phase 1 of the project lasted from October 2007 to October 2008. The results of Phase 1 were documented in 5 " position papers??. These papers provided the basis for further work in Phase 2, lasting from November 2008 to March 2009, resulting in the special topics prioritized for further study in expert working groups in Phase 3. The selection of topics for further work was carried out in close cooperation between the Norwegian and Russian participating organizations. The process was constructive and quick, based on both Russian and Norwegian proposals. There was full agreement between the parties that these topics are important issues which need to be addressed in relation to safeguarding oil and gas operations in the Barents Sea.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.030 | 0.023 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.010 | 0.006 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.006 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".