Sugammadex: a cyclodextrin to reverse neuromuscular blockade in anaesthesia
Bibliographic record
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Neuromuscular blocking agents are used to provide relaxation and immobility during surgery. To avoid residual paralysis after anaesthesia, reversal of blockade is commonly accomplished with anticholinesterase agents but these drugs have cardiovascular side effects and incomplete effectiveness. Sugammadex is a cyclodextrin that binds rocuronium and chemically similar neuromuscular blocking drugs. OBJECTIVE: Published data on the effectiveness of sugammadex as a reversal agent were examined. METHODS: Peer-reviewed articles on residual postoperative paralysis and sugammadex (ORG 25969) were analysed. RESULTS: Rocuronium-sugammadex complexes are formed and excreted via the kidney. The dissociation constant of the reaction is estimated at 0.1 microM. Sugammadex produces more rapid reversal of rocuronium- and vecuronium-induced blockade than current reversal agents. The dose required depends directly on intensity of blockade. To date, there appear to be few side effects. Inadequate dosage may lead to reparalysis. CONCLUSION: More data are needed, especially in patients with renal failure and those who require neuromuscular blockade again soon after receiving sugammadex.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.003 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".