MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2060070536 · doi:10.4141/cjss07026

Estimation of N<sub>2</sub>O emissions from agricultural soils in Canada. II. 1990–2005 inventory

2008· article· en· W2060070536 on OpenAlexvenueaboutno aff
Philippe Rochette, Devon E. Worth, E.C. Huffman, James A. Brierley, B.G. McConkey, Jingyi Yang, J J Hutchinson, R. L. Desjardins, R.E. Lemke, S. Gameda

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Soil Science · 2008
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicSoil Carbon and Nitrogen Dynamics
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGreenhouse gasSoil waterManureEnvironmental scienceAgricultureUnited Nations Framework Convention on Climate ChangeManure managementGrazingEnvironmental protectionAnimal scienceKyoto ProtocolAgronomyEcologySoil scienceBiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

International initiatives such as the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change and the Kyoto Protocol require that countries conduct national inventories of their greenhouse gas emissions. The primary objective of the present study was to apply a country-specific (Tier II) methodology at the regional (≈150 000 ha) scale to estimate direct N 2 O emissions from agricultural soils in Canada for the period 1990–2005. Other N 2 O sources such as manure management and indirect emissions were estimated using the Tier I Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) methodology and were included to provide a complete assessment of agricultural N 2 O emissions. Total N 2 O emissions from agricultural sources averaged 58.1 Gg N 2 O-N yr -1 between 1990 and 2005 (from 48.9 in 1990 to 71.6 Gg N 2 O-N yr -1 in 2004). Of these mean emissions, 39.3 Gg N 2 O-N yr -1 or 68% were direct emissions from soils, 8.7 Gg N 2 O-N yr -1 or 15% were direct emissions from animal waste management systems and 10.1 Gg N 2 O-N yr -1 or 17% were from indirect emissions. Application of synthetic N fertilizers was the largest direct source of soil N 2 O with average emissions during the inventory period of 13.7 Gg N 2 O-N yr -1 or 35% of direct emissions. Crop residues (9.3 Gg N 2 O-N yr -1 ; 24%), grazing animals (6.8 Gg N 2 O-N yr -1 ; 17%) and manure applied to soils (4.1 Gg N 2 O-N yr -1 ; 10%) were the other major direct soil N 2 O sources. New non-IPCC N 2 O sources/offsets included in the Tier II methodology accounted for 10% of total direct soil emissions. Emissions occurring during summerfallow (2.2 Gg N 2 O-N yr -1 ; 6%), in lower portions of the landscape (2.2 Gg N 2 O-N yr -1 ; 6%), and following irrigation (0.7 Gg N 2 O-N yr -1 ; 2%) were partially offset by changes in tillage practices (-1.2 Gg N 2 O-N yr -1 ; -3%) and in coarse-textured soils (-0.2 Gg N 2 O-N yr -1 ; -1%). Differences in N 2 O estimates between Tier I and Tier II approaches mainly arise from the use of lower fertilizer-induced emission factors in the dry Prairie region and the addition of several new N 2 O sources/offsets in the Tier II methodology. Key words: Nitrous oxide, soils, greenhouse gases, inventory

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.413
Threshold uncertainty score0.749

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.188
Teacher spread0.173 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations54
Published2008
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Journal of Soil ScienceSame topicSoil Carbon and Nitrogen DynamicsFrench-language works237,207