Progression of Vertebral and Spinal Three-Dimensional Deformities in Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis
Bibliographic record
Abstract
STUDY DESIGN: The evolution of scoliotic descriptors was analyzed from three-dimensionally reconstructed spines and assessed statistically in a group of adolescents with progressive idiopathic scoliosis. OBJECTIVES: To conduct an intrasubject longitudinal study quantifying evolution of two- and three-dimensional geometrical descriptors characterizing the scoliotic spine and vertebral deformities. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: The data available on geometric descriptors usually are based on cross-sectional studies comparing scoliotic configurations of different individuals. The literature reports very few longitudinal studies that evaluated different phases of scoliotic progression in the same patients. METHODS: The evolution of regional and local descriptors between two scoliotic visits was analyzed in 28 adolescents with scoliosis. Several statistical analyses were performed to determine how spinal curvatures and vertebral deformities change during scoliosis progression. RESULTS: At the thoracic level, vertebral wedging increases with curve severity in a relatively consistent pattern for most patients with scoliosis. Axial rotation mainly increases toward curve convexity with scoliosis severity, worsening the progression of vertebral body deformities. No consistent evolution is associated with the angular orientation of the maximum wedging. Thoracic kyphosis varies considerably among subjects. Both increasing and decreasing kyphosis are observed in nonnegligible proportions. A decrease in kyphosis is associated with a shift in the plane of maximum deformity toward the frontal plane, which worsens the three-dimensional shape of the spine. CONCLUSIONS: The results of this study challenge the existence of a typical scoliotic evolution pattern and suggest that scoliotic evolution is quite variable and patient specific.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".