Effects of pH and salt concentration on the siRNA binding activity of the RNA silencing suppressor protein p19
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The RNA silencing pathway is an important component of the anti-viral immune response in eukaryotes, particularly in plants. In turn, many viruses have evolved mechanisms to evade or suppress this pathway. Tombusviruses such as the Carnation Italian ringspot virus (CIRV) express a 19kDa protein (p19) that is a suppressor of RNA silencing in infected plants. This protein acts as a dimer and binds specifically to short-interfering RNA (siRNA) through electrostatic interactions between charged residues in the binding cleft. Since pH and salt concentrations can vary widely from host to host, we have investigated the influence of these parameters on the siRNA binding activity of CIRV p19. Previously, we established a convenient fluorescence-based method for assaying CIRV p19:siRNA binding using Ni(2+)-NTA coated 96-well plates. Using this method, we observe that the CIRV p19 protein binds to siRNA with nanomolar affinity and that this binding is sensitive to pH and salt concentration. The pH-dissociation constant profile shows that CIRV p19:siRNA binding is dependent on three different apparent pK(a) values. The values extrapolated from the curve are 7.1, 8.0 and 10.6 that we interpret as the ionization of one or more histidine, cysteine and lysine residues, respectively. We find that the optimal suppression of RNA silencing by CIRV p19 occurs in the pH range from 6.2 to 7.6.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".