Effect of angiotensin inhibition on the coronary artery lower pressure limit in anesthetized dogs
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The renin-angiotensin system plays a critical role in regulating vasoconstriction and vasodilatation that can influence myocardial blood flow and its transmural distribution. We tested the hypothesis that angiotensin inhibition can induce a leftward shift of the coronary autoregulatory pressure-flow relation and preserve distribution of myocardial blood flow at lower coronary perfusion pressures. We established circumflex artery pressure-flow relations under baseline conditions and after intracoronary enalaprilat or losartan potassium. Thereafter, transmural myocardial blood flow was measured at baseline and at the lower coronary pressure limit (LPL). With enalaprilat, the LPL was shifted leftward from 48 +/- 6 mmHg at baseline to 43 +/- 3 mmHg (P = 0.026); with losartan, the LPL was shifted leftward from 48 +/- 10 mmHg at baseline to 41 +/- 5 mmHg (P = 0.027). The leftward shift occurred while cardiac hemodynamics and MVO2 were maintained at control levels. These results indicate that angiotensin inhibition extends the range of coronary autoregulation to lower LPL while preserving myocardial blood flow distribution, a physiologic effect that might explain the lower incidence of coronary events in treated patients.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".