MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2060161302 · doi:10.1029/2007gl030620

Ozone depletion in the 2006/2007 Arctic winter

2007· article· en· W2060161302 on OpenAlexfundno aff
J. D. Rösevall, D. Murtagh, J. Urban

Bibliographic record

VenueGeophysical Research Letters · 2007
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicAtmospheric Ozone and Climate
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersH2020 European Research CouncilCanadian Space AgencyTekesCentre National d’Etudes Spatiales
KeywordsOzoneOzone depletionEnvironmental scienceAtmospheric sciencesArcticClimatologyLatitudePolar vortexData assimilationTRACERMeteorologyGeologyOceanographyPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Ozone depletion in the 2006/2007 Arctic winter is studied by assimilating ozone from the Odin/SMR satellite instrument into a 2‐D isentropic transport model. Cross‐isentropic transport is implemented by letting the vortex descend at a rate estimated from the inert tracer N 2 O. Ozone depletion is estimated by comparing ozone fields, passively transported in the model from 1 January 2007, to model fields continuously updated by assimilation of incoming satellite data. Significant ozone destruction is inferred in February and March 2007. By 15 March, an average ozone destruction in the range 0.5–1.0 ppmv is estimated north of 65° equivalent latitude at 475 K potential temperature, whilst 0.3–0.8 ppmv and 0.4–0.8 ppmv ozone destruction is estimated at 525 K and 575 K. By comparing the 2007 ozone depletion to losses inferred in 2003 and 2005 we conclude that the 2007 Arctic ozone destruction is the most severe found in the Odin/SMR data set.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.066
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.030
GPT teacher head0.297
Teacher spread0.266 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations27
Published2007
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueGeophysical Research LettersSame topicAtmospheric Ozone and ClimateFrench-language works237,207