Early Experience With Implantable Collamer Lens in the Management of Hyperopia After Radial Keratotomy
Bibliographic record
Abstract
PURPOSE: To report the initial experience of the use of implantable collamer lens (ICL) in the management of hyperopia after radial keratotomy (RK). METHODS: Single-center, retrospective chart review. Four eyes of 3 patients with secondary hyperopic shift after myopic RK had a mean spherical equivalent of 5.31 D (range, 3.25-9 D) on presentation. All of them underwent ICL implantation to correct the refractive error. RESULTS: There were no intraoperative complications. At a mean follow-up of 5.5 months (range, 3-7 months), the mean uncorrected visual acuity improved from 20/130 preoperatively to 20/24 postoperatively, and the mean spherical equivalent decreased from 5.31 D preoperatively to 0.08 D postoperatively. At 1-month follow-up, all eyes had an uncorrected visual acuity better than or equal to preoperative best spectacle-corrected visual acuity. Two eyes were within 0.25 D and all were within 0.5 D of the predicted refractive target. CONCLUSIONS: ICL implantation is an effective surgical option to consider in the management of hyperopia after RK. However, a large cohort and longer follow-up are needed to determine the long-term efficacy and safety of this procedure in this clinical setting.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".