Abstract 770: Overcoming Trastuzumab resistance with the novel pan-erbb inhibitor AZD8931
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Approximately 15-20% of all invasive breast carcinomas overexpress the HER-2 receptor, a membrane surface-bound receptor tyrosine kinase upstream of critical proliferation and cell survival pathways. Trastuzumab, a humanized monoclonal antibody to the extracellular domain of HER-2, has proven to be a beneficial treatment for patients diagnosed as HER-2+, but does have its limitations. A majority of advanced HER-2 positive breast cancer patients will develop resistance to the therapy within the first year while many others do not respond to the drug when used alone. The purpose of this study was to determine whether AZD8931, a reversible pan-ERBB inhibitor that equipotently inhibits the tyrosine kinase-activity of EGFR, HER-2, and HER-3, could reverse this resistance in established trastuzumab-resistant BT474 and SKBR3 cell lines. To account for tumor heterogeneity in HER-2+ tumors, response to AZD8931 was examined in both ER-positive (BT474) and ER-negative (SKBR3) cell lines. Proliferation assays were used to assess the efficacy of AZD8931 alone and in combination with trastuzumab. Results showed significantly diminished cell growth in all tested cell lines, including those resistant to trastuzumab, at clinically relevant concentrations of AZD8931 (<2µM). Furthermore, when AZD8931 was tested in conjunction with trastuzumab, the resistance to trastuzumab was reversed using clinically relevant doses of trastuzumab. Using combination indices, it was found that AZD8931 synergizes well with trastuzumab and could be used as a combination therapy for both trastuzumab-sensitive and trastuzumab-resistant breast cancer patients. Western blot analyses confirmed the results of cell proliferation assays as p-EGFR, p-HER-2, p-HER-3, p-Akt, and p-MAPK, were all reduced after treatment with AZD8931. Thus, AZD8931 alone or in combination with trastuzumab may be an effective therapy in HER2+ breast cancers. Citation Format: {Authors}. {Abstract title} [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 103rd Annual Meeting of the American Association for Cancer Research; 2012 Mar 31-Apr 4; Chicago, IL. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2012;72(8 Suppl):Abstract nr 770. doi:1538-7445.AM2012-770
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".