MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2060269017 · doi:10.5370/jicee.2013.3.4.340

Effective Voltage Control by SVR to Reduce the Capacity of SVC using Solar Radiation Information with Real Time Simulator

2013· article· en· W2060269017 on OpenAlexaff
Shinya Sekizaki, Mutsumi Aoki, Hiroyuki Ukai, Shunsuke Sasaki, Takaya Shigetou, Weihua Wang, Jean Bélanger

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of International Council on Electrical Engineering · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicOptimal Power Flow Distribution
Canadian institutionsOpal-Rt Technologies (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPhotovoltaic systemVoltageStatic VAR compensatorControl theory (sociology)Voltage regulatorComputer scienceVoltage regulationEngineeringAC powerControl (management)Electrical engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

With the increasing the number of Photovoltaic generators (PV) connected to distribution system (DS), several concerns such as rise and sudden change of voltage on distribution line are growing in Japan. Step Voltage Regulator (SVR) is well known as the one of voltage control equipment used in current DS. Meanwhile, SVR cannot regulate rapid voltage change because SVR has time delay against variation of voltage. In contrast, Static Var Compensator (SVC) is the effective device to control voltage changed rapidly. However, since the cost of SVC with large capacity is expensive, it is important to reduce the capacity of SVC in order to increase the introduction of SVC into power system. From this background, the novel control method of SVR using solar radiation information to reduce the capacity of SVC is proposed in this paper. The effectiveness of the proposed method is confirmed by numerical simulation with real time simulator.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.003

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.186
Teacher spread0.180 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2013
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of International Council on Electrical EngineeringSame topicOptimal Power Flow DistributionFrench-language works237,207