MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2060336285 · doi:10.1002/lary.21365

Hyaluronic acid fat graft myringoplasty: A minimally invasive technique

2011· article· en· W2060336285 on OpenAlex
Issam Saliba, Owen Woods

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Laryngoscope · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicEar Surgery and Otitis Media
Canadian institutionsUniversité de Montréal
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMyringoplastyHyaluronic acidMedicineSurgeryAnatomyTympanoplasty

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

OBJECTIVES: Hyaluronic acid fat graft myringoplasty (HAFGM) is a new technique for tympanic membrane perforation (TMP) treatment. It is simple, inexpensive, and performed under local anesthesia at the outpatient office department. We aim to evaluate the HAFGM on different TMP sizes, to compare the success rate of HAFGM with the underlay and overlay techniques, and to assess the hearing improvement at one year postoperatively. STUDY DESIGN: Prospective study. METHODS: Patients were divided into three groups depending on the patient's choice of technique: HAFGM (group I), underlay technique (group II), and overlay technique (group III). Perforations were classified into four grades. Postoperatively, the status of the eardrum, the improvement of hearing, and the incidence of complications were the main criteria for measuring outcome. RESULTS: Distribution of TMP was 131, 63, and 52 in group I, II, and III, respectively. Global successful rate and successful closure of the grade I, II, III, and IV were the same for the three groups. Postoperatively, no worsening of bone conduction threshold was noted. Air-bone gap (ABG) was statistically similar for the three groups. No complications were noted for group I. The mean duration of the operative procedures was 16, 65, and 74 minutes for group I, II, and III, respectively (P = .02). The mean postoperative follow-up was 18.7, 20.6, and 15.5 months for groups I, II, and III, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: HAFGM success rate is comparable to that of the underlay and overlay techniques. Furthermore, it requires no hospitalization and avoids the difficulty of overlay and underlay tympanoplasty.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.193
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.029
GPT teacher head0.240
Teacher spread0.211 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it