No evidence for short or long term morbidity after increased titer measles vaccination in Sudan
Bibliographic record
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Increased mortality rates have been reported after high titer measles [>10(5.0) plaque-forming units (PFU)] vaccination in several large studies in the developing world. An increased titer measles vaccine study conducted in Sudan included a prolonged prospective evaluation of childhood morbidity after vaccination. METHODS: Five hundred ten children (170 per group) were randomized to receive 1 of 3 regimens at 5 and 9 months of age: (1) meningococcal vaccine, then standard titer (50% tissue culture-infective dose, 103.8) Schwarz measles vaccine; (2) increased titer (10(4.7) PFU) Edmonston-Zagreb measles vaccine followed by meningococcal vaccine; and (3) increased titer (10(4.7) PFU) Connaught vaccine followed by standard titer Schwarz measles vaccine. RESULTS: Health workers collected information at 31,582 semi-monthly and monthly visits during 5 years. No increase in infant mortality was observed, but the statistical power was limited. There were 13, 13 and 10 deaths in the Schwarz, Edmonston-Zagreb and Connaught groups, respectively. There were no differences in duration or incidence of illness between groups at any time during the 5-year follow-up, with comparisons stratified by age and sex. Statistical power for each pairwise comparison was good, with at least 80% power to detect a difference of 1 day per month of illness and a 12% difference in the proportion of visits with an illness recorded. CONCLUSIONS: We were unable to document increased morbidity in recipients of the increased titer measles vaccines used in this study. These data do not support the hypothesis that increased mortality after increased titer vaccine exposure is the result of increased and cumulative morbidity.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.008 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".