Anatomic relationship between the internal jugular vein and the carotid artery in preschool children – an Ultrasonographic Study
Bibliographic record
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Central venous cannulation in young children is technically difficult and may lead to potentially serious complications especially when performed blindly or using anatomical landmarks only. AIM: The aim of this study was to determine the anatomical relationship of the internal jugular vein (IJV) and the common carotid artery (CA) in preschool children using ultrasound. METHODS: Forty five children aged 60 months and under were included prospectively and divided into three groups: group 1: <6 months, group 2: 7-18 months and group 3: 19-60 months. With the head in neutral position the location of the left and right IJV was noted as anterior (A), anterolateral (AL), lateral (L) or medial (M) in relation to the CA at the level of the cricoid cartilage. Depths of IJV and CA as well as time taken to locate the vessels were recorded. RESULTS: The IJV was more commonly found in the AL position in all groups. The mean depth was 0.96 cm in group 1, 0.95 cm in group 2 and 3. Mean duration for localization of the vessels was 4.2 s in group 1, 4 s in group 2 and 4.3 s in group 3. The differences between the groups were not significant. CONCLUSION: This study demonstrates that the IJV cover the CA in the majority of young children. Depth of the IJV is rarely more than 1 cm deep to the skin. Ultrasound location of the IJV and CA is easy and does not necessarily delay the procedure. The findings of this study support the use of ultrasound guidance for CVC in children.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".