Investigation of Hot Cathode and Hollow Anode of Argon Glow Discharge Plasma
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Hot cathode and hollow anode argon DC glow discharge plasma at different pressures of (0.04, 0.05, 0.06, 0.07, 0.09, 0.2, 0.4, and 0.8 mbar) has been investigated. The experiments were carried out under the influence of pressure and filament cathode current on voltage – current characteristics of glow discharge and its breakdown voltage. Plasma parameters have been measured and obtained using single probe method at fixed discharge current (Id=1.88 mA) and hollow anode diameter. A computer MATLAB program is performed for this purpose. It was shown that the discharge voltage – current characteristics curve has a positive resistance and represents an abnormal glow region at pressure (0.04 and 0.06) mbar for different filament current. The breakdown voltage increases as the filament current is increased. In different pressure, electron temperature shows different behavior with increasing filament current. Electron density varies nearly inversely with the filament current, but it is increase due to increase of pressure from (1 to 3 mbar), then tends to decrease for the higher pressure. There are two groups of electrons according to the two peaks of (EEDFs), and the peaks amplitude decrease, with the increases of both filament current and gas pressure.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".