The Synthesis of Three‐Degree‐of‐Freedom Planar Parallel Mechanisms with Revolute Joints (3‐RRR) for an Optimal Singularity‐Free Workspace
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract In this paper, a method is presented for the synthesis of 3‐ R RR planar parallel mechanisms. The method uses a genetic algorithm while considering three different design criteria: the optimization of the mechanism workspace to approach a prescribed workspace, the maximization of the mechanism's dexterity, and the avoidance of singularities inside the mechanism workspace. It is shown that, for a given mechanism, some working modes do not have any corresponding singularity curves located inside the mechanism workspace. Furthermore, a case is presented where, for a given orientation range of the mechanism's end‐effector, there are no parallel singularities located inside the workspace. Finally, two methods are described and compared to deal with the nonuniform units of the mechanism's Jacobian matrix during the dexterity computation. © 2004 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it