MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2060448472 · doi:10.1107/s090744490001979x

Purification, crystallization and preliminary X-ray analysis of the<i>Escherichia coli</i>glucose-1-phosphatase

2001· article· en· W2060448472 on OpenAlexaff
Zongchao Jia, Mike Cottrill, Gour P. Pal, Daniel Lee, Michael Sung, Cecil W. Forsberg, J. P. Phillips

Bibliographic record

VenueActa Crystallographica Section D Biological Crystallography · 2001
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicEnzyme Structure and Function
Canadian institutionsUniversity of GuelphQueen's University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsEscherichia coliPeriplasmic spaceCrystallizationChemistryPhosphataseCrystallographyEnzymeBiochemistryOrganic chemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Encoded by the agp gene, Escherichia coli glucose-1-phosphatase hydrolyzes glucose-1-phosphate in the periplasmic space of the bacterium. It is a potential drug-design target because inositol phosphatases have been identified as important virulence determinants in several human and animal pathogens. The enzyme was isolated and purified to homogeneity from a strain of E. coli CU1867 (an appA-deficient mutant). Crystals were obtained overnight by the equilibrium vapour-diffusion method from a solution containing 10 mg ml(-1) enzyme, 1.2 M ammonium sulfate and 25% polyethylene glycol monomethyl ether 5000 in 0.1 M MES at pH 6.5. The crystals belong to space group R3, with unit-cell parameters a = b = 156.0, c = 92.2 A. The diffraction limit was 2.6 A at a rotating-anode X-ray source; a 2.7 A resolution data set has been collected using light mineral oil as a cryoprotectant. The data set was 95.2% complete, with an R(sym) of 0.058. There were two monomers of glucose-1-phosphatase in the asymmetric unit, which correspond to a V(M) of 2.36 A Da(-1) and 47.5% solvent content. Self-rotation analysis unambiguously shows a twofold non-crystallographic symmetry.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.906
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.007
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.218
Teacher spread0.205 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2001
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueActa Crystallographica Section D Biological CrystallographySame topicEnzyme Structure and FunctionFrench-language works237,207