Piloting a Peer-Driven Intervention Model to Increase Access and Adherence to Antiretroviral Therapy and HIV Care among Street-Entrenched HIV-Positive Women in Vancouver
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
A peer-driven intervention (PDI) was developed to support uptake and adherence to highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART) among women sex workers who use illicit substances in Vancouver, because uptake and adherence continues to be suboptimal. Trends of adherence were examined among women in this program by (1) exposure to the intervention and (2) risk behaviors including drug use and unstable housing. Between January 2007 and January 2008, 20 HIV-positive women were enrolled into the PDI on a rolling basis. PDI participation included weekly peer support meetings, a health advocate (buddy) system, peer outreach service, and onsite nursing care. Adherence was measured directly with pharmacy records (PR) and indirectly with self-report and viral load (VL) outcomes. Participants attended an average of 50 (21-70) PDI meetings. Overall self-reported adherence was high (92%) and most women (11) reported increased adherence from the first to the last 13 PDI meetings attended (average increase = 18%). The number of viral load tests <or=50 copies/mL increased by 40% from the pre-PDI period (1 year before enrollment), to the PDI period (duration enrolled). PR adherence and improvements in VL outcomes were higher among participants with greater housing instability and frequency of injecting/smoking drugs. Despite a very difficult environment to provide HIV care, there is evidence to suggest that the PDI may have had a positive impact on adherence outcomes. Although this would not predict long-term treatment success, the PDI approach to HIV treatment support is a promising program for women who might otherwise be excluded from treatment altogether.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it