Nodular regenerative hyperplasia of the liver: An under‐recognized cause of portal hypertension in hematological disorders
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Portal hypertension has been described in a wide variety of hematological disorders, especially myeloproliferative and lymphoproliferative disorders. Its clinical manifestations may include bleeding esophageal varices, ascites, or hepatic encephalopathy. In patients with hematological disorders, there are a number of potential causes of portal hypertension, including nodular regenerative hyperplasia of the liver (NRH). This lesion is characterized by diffuse replacement of normal hepatic parenchyma by multiple small nodules composed of regenerating hepatocytes with minimal or no fibrosis. This lack of fibrosis distinguishes NRH from cirrhosis. Unlike cirrhosis, NRH only rarely results in compromised hepatic synthetic function. The major manifestation is portal hypertension related to increased resistance to blood flow within hepatic sinusoids. NRH has been linked to a variety of systemic diseases including collagen vascular diseases, myeloproliferative and lymphoproliferative disorders, as well as various medications. Although NRH is commonly associated with blood dyscrasias, the diagnosis is overlooked because of the complexity and wide differential diagnosis of liver diseases in the setting of hematological malignancy. We review herein nodular regenerative hyperplasia of the liver, including aspects of epidemiology, pathogenesis, differential diagnosis, clinical course, and treatment. We highlight its association with different forms of hematological disease, aiming to increase the awareness of this entity to the internist and the treating hematologist/oncologist.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".