Probing of the hot-band excitations in the photodissociation of OCS at 288 nm by DC slice imaging
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The photodissociation dynamics of OCS at 288 nm has been investigated using the DC (direct current) slice imaging technique, which is a recently developed high-resolution "slicing" approach that directly measures the central slice of the photofragment distribution in imaging experiments. By analyzing a DC sliced image of S(1D2) photofragments we observe dissociation originating from OCS molecules excited up to v2 = 4 in the molecular beam. The measured translational energy distribution was used to determine the branching ratio for the contribution from each initial bending state (0 v2 0) of OCS and relative photodissociation cross section ratios compared to v2 = 1. Large negative anisotropy parameters determined as a function of the S(1D2) fragment recoil speed indicate that the photodissociation of OCS at 288 nm occurs exclusively from the 11A′′(1Σ) bending excited potential surface that can be accessed through a perpendicular transition.Key words: DC slicing imaging, OCS, photodissociation, hot-band excitation.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".