MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2060550319 · doi:10.1177/1077546304036229

Fuzzy Logic Control of the End-Point Vibration in an Experimental Flexible Beam

2004· article· en· W2060550319 on OpenAlex
Amor Jnifene, William S. Andrews

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Vibration and Control · 2004
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicDynamics and Control of Mechanical Systems
Canadian institutionsRoyal Military College of CanadaUniversity of Ottawa
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAngular displacementTachometerVibrationDeflection (physics)Beam (structure)Control theory (sociology)Angular velocityEngineeringPhysicsStructural engineeringComputer scienceAcousticsOpticsClassical mechanicsDC motorElectrical engineeringControl (management)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper is concerned with the design and implementation of a fuzzy logic controller (FLC) to control the end-point vibration in a single flexible beam mounted on a two-degrees-of-freedom platform. The angular position of the hub and the signal from a strain gage mounted on the beam are used as the two inputs to the FLC. In order to add more damping, the strain gage signal is combined with the hub angular velocity represented by the output of a tachometer attached to the motor shaft. We discuss how to build the rule base for the flexible beam based on the relation between the angular displacement of the hub and the end-point deflection, as well as the effect of different scaling gains on the performance of the FLC. We present several experimental results showing the effectiveness of the FLC in reducing the end-point vibration of the flexible beam.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.636
Threshold uncertainty score0.287

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.218
Teacher spread0.210 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it