Cross-Flow Past a Pair of Staggered Cylinders With the Upstream Cylinder Subjected to a Transverse Harmonic Oscillation
Bibliographic record
Abstract
An experimental investigation of the cross-flow past a pair of staggered circular cylinders, with the downstream cylinder subject to forced harmonic oscillation transverse to the flow direction, is presented in this paper. In particular, flow-visualization of the wakeformation region and hot-film measurements of the wake spectra are reported. Experiments were conducted in a water tunnel for Reynolds numbers, based on upstream velocity, U, and cylinder diameter, D, in the range 1440 ≤ Re ≤ 1680. The longitudinal separation between cylinder centers is L/D = 2.0, with a transverse separation (for the mean position of the upstream cylinder) of T/D = 0.17. As shown in an earlier study, depending on the actual position of the upstream cylinder in its oscillation cycle, this configuration straddles the shear-layer reattachment and induced separation regimes. The results show that the oscillation of the upstream cylinder causes considerable modification of the flow patterns and regimes compared to what is obtained when the cylinder is fixed. In particular, depending on the frequency of oscillation of the upstream cylinder, sub- and superharmonic resonances are obtained between the vortex formation frequency and oscillation frequency, as well as the usual fundamental lock-in. These resonances and accompanying wake regimes are examined in detail in this paper.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".