Bibliographic record
Abstract
Beyond the recent debates of WTO development issues, the Doha failure in particular, this paper extends its critical enquiry to past law and development scholarship to reveal the intertwining relationship between the international trading regime and the development failure. The paper's examination of the development paradigm's evolution from an economic-growth-oriented to multi-dimensional framework indicates that law plays a key role in the development failure. Further analysis discovers that the development crisis lies in its self-sufficient legitimacy deficit where the developed, as the model of development, bears its own legitimacy and the developing are framed in the fate of catching-up. The paper argues that this self-sufficient development deficit can be further traced back to the Enlightenment's notion of progression that implies a constant return to origins. Through this origin-obsessive mechanism, while law's past determines its present through the power of precedent in the system of modern law, the present of the developed as the development model determines the future of the developing in the development paradigm. Through taking up the contemporary intellectual property issue in WTO compliance, the paper's examination of the impact of the WTO intellectual property regime on developing countries demonstrates how the intersection of development failure and modern law's myth of origin reveals itself in WTO compliance. Building on this finding, the paper proposes a jurisprudential reconstruction to break through the development impasse, and argues that a rethinking of the development paradigm at the same time must be a reconstruction of the contemporary jurisprudence.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".