Madness and crime: Historical perspectives on forensic psychiatry
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The twentieth-century development of forensic psychiatry and criminology, occupying the border-area of the medical and psychological sciences on the one hand and the administration of justice and penal regimes on the other, has received little systematic attention by scholars. The bulk of historical studies on forensic psychiatry and criminology concerns the nineteenth and early twentieth centuries. Synthetic, comprehensive national studies of the twentieth-century development of forensic psychiatry as well as contextual and internationally comparative research, throwing light on the similarities, differences and contrasts between countries, are thin on the ground. <br/>The collection of articles in this special issue of the International Journal of Law and Psychiatry represents one of the first attempts in the historical study of forensic psychiatry to set the national developments in a number of major Western countries side by side, enabling comparison across jurisdictions, and demonstrating the relevance of key themes that transcend national boundaries. Its overall aim is to understand the history of forensic psychiatry, as discourse as well as practice, in its institutional, wider socio-political and international settings. The collection, comprising twelve articles, offers broad overviews of developments in ten European and North-American countries – the United Kingdom, France, Germany, Italy, Russia, The Netherlands, Norway, Sweden, Switzerland, and Canada. Thus, the collection provides a valuable resource for scholars of different stripes, and offers something of a corrective to the overrepresentation of certain national traditions in the historical study of forensic psychiatry. <br/>In this Introduction we sketch the general historical background of forensic psychiatry and we discuss the main themes, points of interest and questions that have served as a guideline for the national overviews contained in this collection. Recurring topics include: forensic psychiatry’s relation to legal traditions and schools; the motives of psychiatrists to push their professional domain towards criminal law, the philosophies, scientific theories and treatments they used and the problems and dilemmas they encountered; the attitudes of lawyers vis-à-vis forensic psychiatry; the relation between legal and medical ideals, theories, discourses and practices, including in particular differing and changing meanings of criminal insanity and non-responsibility, and their implications; the place of forensic psychiatry in the broader field of medicine, psychiatry, mental health care, and social work, as well as the involvement of other professions in forensic work; forensic psychiatry’s target groups populating the border area between criminal law and psychiatry, and the way these groups were affected by forensic practices; the forensic institutional infrastructure, in particular the way in which psychiatry became established in the administration of justice; the periodization of, and the continuities or discontinuities in, the development of forensic psychiatry; the socio-political contexts in which forensic psychiatry evolved; and the way historians have interpreted its development, in particular professionalization theory and the Foucaultian view of the entanglement of law and psychiatry and its disciplinary role in modern society. <br/>
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".