MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2060664748 · doi:10.1002/ejic.200700400

Kinetics and Magnetism of Phosphane Diadducts of Diruthenium(II,III) Tetraacetate

2007· article· en· W2060664748 on OpenAlexaff
T.J. Burchell, T. Stanley Cameron, Donal H. Macartney, Laurence K. Thompson, M.A.S. Aquino

Bibliographic record

VenueEuropean Journal of Inorganic Chemistry · 2007
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldChemistry
TopicOrganometallic Complex Synthesis and Catalysis
Canadian institutionsMemorial University of NewfoundlandQueen's UniversityDalhousie UniversitySt. Francis Xavier University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsChemistryAcetonitrileLigand (biochemistry)Magnetic susceptibilityMagnetismCrystallographyMedicinal chemistryRutheniumStereochemistryCatalysisOrganic chemistryReceptor

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract The kinetic parameters for the axial‐ligand‐substitution reactions of [Ru2(μ‐O2CCH3)4(MeCN)2]+ in acetonitrile (MeCN) with PCy3 and PCy2Ph (Cy = cyclohexyl and Ph = phenyl) were investigated under pseudo first‐order conditions of excess phosphane. The rate‐determining formation of [Ru2(μ‐O2CCH3)4(MeCN)(PCy2R]+ appears independent of the nature of the incoming phosphane with an average k1 (25.0 °C) = (1.25 ± 0.06) × 103 M–1 s–1. A dissociatively activated mechanism is proposed for substitution of the axially coordinated acetonitrile, and the rate parameters are compared to earlier measurements carried out on [Rh2(μ‐O2CCH3)4(MeCN)2]. Variable‐temperature magnetic susceptibility measurements were carried out on the two phosphane diadducts, [Ru2(μ‐O2CCH3)4(PCy3)2]PF6, (1) and [Ru2(μ‐O2CCH3)4(PCy2Ph)2]PF6 (2), and showed behaviour unique to a Boltzmann distribution of states over the temperature range 2–300 K. To support the magnetic measurements, the single‐crystal X‐ray structure of 1 was redetermined at various temperatures down to –150 °C and showed a distinct decrease in the Ru–Ru bond length with decreasing temperature, consistent with a σ2π4δ2π*3 configuration at low temperature (ground state) and a σ2π4δ2π*2δ*1 configuration at room temp. In addition, the structure redeterminations of 1 were better resolved than the earlier reported structure and also corrected a minor error in that the molecule of solvation was found to be 1,2‐dichloroethane instead of dichloromethane. (© Wiley‐VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, 69451 Weinheim, Germany, 2007)

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.192
Teacher spread0.184 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations8
Published2007
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEuropean Journal of Inorganic ChemistrySame topicOrganometallic Complex Synthesis and CatalysisFrench-language works237,207