MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2060747038 · doi:10.1088/0004-637x/795/1/44

COSMOLOGICAL CONSTRAINTS FROM MEASUREMENTS OF TYPE Ia SUPERNOVAE DISCOVERED DURING THE FIRST 1.5 yr OF THE Pan-STARRS1 SURVEY

2014· article· en· W2060747038 on OpenAlexafffund
A. Rest, D. Scolnic, R. J. Foley, M. E. Huber, R. Chornock, Gautham Narayan, J. Tonry, E. Berger, Alicia Soderberg, C. W. Stubbs, Adam G. Riess, R. Kirshner, S. J. Smartt, Edward F. Schlafly, S. Rodney, M. T. Botticella, Dillon Brout, Peter Challis, Ian Czekala, M. R. Drout, Michael J. Hudson, R. Kotak, C. Leibler, R. Lunnan, G. H. Marion, M. McCrum, D. Milisavljević, A. Pastorello, Nathan Sanders, K. Smith, Elizabeth A. Stafford, David A. Thilker, S. Valenti, W. M. Wood‐Vasey, Zheng Zheng, W. S. Burgett, K. C. Chambers, L. Denneau, P. W. Draper, H. Flewelling, K. W. Hodapp, N. Kaiser, Rolf‐Peter Kudritzki, E. A. Magnier, N. Metcalfe, P. A. Price, William E. Sweeney, R. J. Wainscoat, C. Waters

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Astrophysical Journal · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicGamma-ray bursts and supernovae
Canadian institutionsPerimeter InstituteUniversity of Waterloo
FundersComisión Nacional de Investigación Científica y TecnológicaPlanetary Science DivisionScience Mission DirectorateSmithsonian Astrophysical ObservatoryNational Central UniversityMinisterio de Ciencia, Tecnología e Innovación ProductivaSpace Telescope Science InstituteQueen's UniversityOffice of ScienceJohns Hopkins UniversityQueen's University BelfastMinistério da Ciência, Tecnologia e InovaçãoNational Aeronautics and Space AdministrationEötvös Loránd TudományegyetemU.S. Department of EnergyHarvard UniversityDurham UniversitySmithsonian InstitutionNational Science Foundation
KeywordsPhysicsSupernovaAstrophysicsPlanckCosmic microwave backgroundHubble's lawLight curveFlatness (cosmology)Type (biology)Dark energyCosmological constantStarsCosmologyMathematical physicsQuantum mechanics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We present griz P1 light curves of 146 spectroscopically confirmed Type Ia supernovae (SNe Ia; 0.03 < z < 0.65) discovered during the first 1.5 yr of the Pan-STARRS1 Medium Deep Survey. The Pan-STARRS1 natural photometric system is determined by a combination of on-site measurements of the instrument response function and observations of spectrophotometric standard stars. We find that the systematic uncertainties in the photometric system are currently 1.2% without accounting for the uncertainty in the Hubble Space Telescope Calspec definition of the AB system. A Hubble diagram is constructed with a subset of 113 out of 146 SNe Ia that pass our light curve quality cuts. The cosmological fit to 310 SNe Ia (113 PS1 SNe Ia + 222 light curves from 197 low-z SNe Ia), using only supernovae (SNe) and assuming a constant dark energy equation of state and flatness, yields w = -1.120 +0.360 -0.206 (Stat) +0.269 -0.291 (Sys). When combined with BAO+CMB(Planck)+H 0 , the analysis yields M = 0.280 +0.013 -0.012 and w = -1.166 +0.072 -0.069 including all identified systematics. The value of w is inconsistent with the cosmological constant value of -1 at the 2.3 level. Tension endures after removing either the baryon acoustic oscillation (BAO) or the H 0 constraint, though it is strongest when including the H 0 constraint. If we include WMAP9 cosmic microwave background (CMB) constraints instead of those from Planck, we find w = -1.124 +0.083 -0.065 , which diminishes the discord to <2 . We cannot conclude whether the tension with flat CDM is a feature of dark energy, new physics, or a combination of chance and systematic errors. The full Pan-STARRS1 SN sample with three times as many SNe should provide more conclusive results.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.010
Threshold uncertainty score0.020

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.026
GPT teacher head0.239
Teacher spread0.213 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations343
Published2014
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Astrophysical JournalSame topicGamma-ray bursts and supernovaeFrench-language works237,207