MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2060782383 · doi:10.1080/10646175.2010.519590

Journalism in Indian Country: Story Telling That Makes Sense

2010· article· en· W2060782383 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Sharon M. Murphy

Bibliographic record

VenueHoward Journal of Communications · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicMedia Studies and Communication
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsJournalismSociologyMedia studiesSense (electronics)Political scienceGender studies

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Despite its importance, Native American journalism is rarely included in histories of Native peoples or in most histories and analyses of American journalism. This article applies Carey's theory of journalism as a state of consciousness to Native American journalism. It explores approaches early Native American journalists took to apprehending and experiencing the cataclysmic changes taking place in their worlds, establishing written identities for their own communities and among their non-Indian neighbors, and adopting and adapting accepted conventions of American journalism. Further, it examines current Native media that work in and expand on the traditions that began in the early 19th century and amid some of the same challenges experienced then. KEYTERMS: American Indian mediaElias BoudinotNative American journalismnative broadcastnative story tellingtraditional cultures Notes By way of clarification, the terms Indian, American Indian, and Native American are used interchangeably among Native media people, and different terms have been favored across the 180 years of Native-American press history (Rolo, Citation2000). "First Nations" is also sometimes used, more often in Canada. The term Indian Country is also often used by Native journalists, in publication titles, and in references to their media. It uses the 18 U. S. C. 1151 definition, "land within the limits of any Indian reservation under the jurisdiction of the United States Government." Culturally distinct from American Indians, Alaska Natives prefer that title to any of the others. Similarly, Native Hawaiians and Pacific Islanders are a distinct group and do not use the terms Indian and Native American. The term Five Civilized Tribes referred to the Cherokee, Chickasaw, Choctaw, Creek, and Seminole Nations; these tribes were the most active in journalism during the 19th century. A number of listings are available, some more current than others, because of the fluid state of the print media. The carefully prepared Tippeconnic listings are helpful, as are lists available online at cites like the following: http://www.ausbcomp.com/Redman/print_publications.htm, http://www.nativeamericancwic.org/native_american_newspapers.html, and http://www.nativeweb.org/resources/news_media_television_radio/newspapers_-_native_indigenous/ Like newspaper listings, those for Native broadcast change as new licenses and programming arrangements develop. See listings in Machiorlatti (Citation2006, pp. 138–142). Two websites listing current Native American radio stations and stations broadcasting Native American programs are http://www.afn.org/~native/radstats.htm and http://www.hanksville.org/sand/contacts/NAPR.html

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.925
Threshold uncertainty score0.950

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.056
GPT teacher head0.343
Teacher spread0.288 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations10
Published2010
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueHoward Journal of CommunicationsSame topicMedia Studies and CommunicationFrench-language works237,207