Atypical caudal duplication with phenotypic sex reversal in a dog
Bibliographic record
Abstract
A male German Shepherd Dog mix was presented for chronic non-weight-bearing lameness of the left hind limb. At clinical examination, the dog's left hind limb had severe joint contractures, with the presence of what appeared to be a second paw. The dog also had 2 sets of external genitalia of opposite phenotypic sex; a complete male reproductive tract with a left retained testicle and a right descended testicle, as well as rudimentary female external genitalia including a hypoplastic vulva with a blind-end vagina and a hypertrophied clitoris. The female genitalia were located on the proximal posterior third of the deformed limb. Following amputation of the hind limb, gross pathologic analysis revealed a duplication of the fibula, tarsal, and metatarsal bones, digits, and appendices. The supernumerary structures and female genitalia were concluded to represent a parasitic twin. As conjoined or parasitic twinning of non-identical twins is thought to be impossible, the presence of genitalia of opposite phenotypic sex appeared paradoxical. Polymerase chain reaction analyses were therefore performed to determine the genotypic sex of both animals, which revealed the presence of the Y chromosome in all tissues, including the female genitalia. The non-masculinization of the external genitalia in the parasitic twin was presumed to be the result of an embryonic developmental defect. On this basis, a diagnosis of atypical caudal duplication (parasitic twinning) with phenotypic sex reversal was made.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".