Effect of Inhaling 100% O <sub>2</sub> on Ventilation and Acid-Base Balance in Cerebrospinal Fluid of Neonates
Bibliographic record
Abstract
If 100% O2 produces hyperventilation by increasing central CO2 due to cerebral vasoconstriction or dimished reduction of oxyhemoglobin, then, there should be a parallel decrease in alveolar and CSF PCO2 during O2 breathing in neonates. To test this hypothesis, we measured ventilation, alveolar PCO2 and CSF PCO2, pH and HCO2 before and 10-20 min after infants began breathing 100% O2. With 100% O2, minute ventilation increased from 0.193 +/- (SE) 0.013 (n = 7) to 0.252 +/- 0.013 liter/min/kg (p less than 0.015), PACO2 decreased from 42 +/- 2 to 38 +/- 2 mm Hg (p less than 0.005), CSF PCO2 decreased from 51 +/- 1 to 44 +/- 1 mm Hg (p less than 0.015), and pH increased from 7.308 +/- 0.013 to 7.354 +/- 0.013 (p less than 0.05). CSF bicarbonate decreased, but not significantly. These findings, showing a trend toward alkalosis, suggest that the neonate, like the adult man, induces hyperventilation during hyperoxia via an increase in PCO2 at the central level.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".