Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
A scanning tunneling microscope tip is used to create nanoscale contacts on degenerately doped ${n}^{+}\text{\ensuremath{-}}\mathrm{Si}(100)$ surfaces. Current-voltage spectra are recorded as the tip transitions from tunneling to point contact on surfaces prepared in three ways: (1) the clean $2\ifmmode\times\else\texttimes\fi{}1$ surface, (2) with a covalently bonded benzene overlayer, and (3) through nanoscale clean silicon windows formed within the benzene film. Contacts to the clean surface are more Ohmic than rectifying and show a surface leakage current that arises from partially occupied ${\ensuremath{\pi}}^{*}$ states. Contacts to the benzene surface do not display a surface current and exhibit significant current rectification. The unpinning of the Si band structure by the organic adsorbate leads to inversion and a limiting minority-carrier tunnel current under reverse bias. Contacts to the windows simulate defects to an overlayer and reveal characteristics of a hybrid junction. Current-voltage spectra through the windows are free of surface leakage and are independent of the cleaned area. The return of majority carrier tunneling under reverse bias demonstrates that the pinning states of the clean substrate are restored to the windows. However, the charge distribution on the windows is significantly different from the clean surface because the restored surface states are isolated within the benzene monolayer.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it