MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2060817104 · doi:10.1139/z05-146

Mitochondrial DNA variation in water shrews (<i>Sorex</i><i>palustris</i>,<i>Sorex</i><i>bendirii</i>) from western North America: implications for taxonomy and phylogeography

2005· article· en· W2060817104 on OpenAlexvenueaboutno aff
Mark B. O'Neill, David W. Nagorsen, Robert J. Baker

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Zoology · 2005
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicBat Biology and Ecology Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSubspeciesShrewSorexBiologyPhylogeographyEcologyVicariancePleistoceneTaxonomy (biology)ZoologyPhylogenetic treePaleontology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Inter- and intra-specific variations in cytochrome b (Cytb) sequence were assessed in 22 specimens of Sorex palustris Richardson, 1828 and 6 specimens of Sorex bendirii (Merriam, 1884) from 20 locations in western North America. Phylogenetic analyses revealed three distinct clades: Boreal (S. p. palustris), Cordilleran (S. p. brooksi, S. p. navigator), and Coastal (S. b. palmeri, S. b. bendirii). Sequence divergence between the Boreal and the Coastal–Cordilleran lineages was 6.9%, while the divergence between the Coastal and the Cordilleran clades was 3.1%. Sorex palustris brooksi, a subspecies endemic to Vancouver Island, showed minor divergence from mainland samples of S. p. navigator. The results suggest that S. palustris may consist of two species: a boreal eastern form (S. palustris) and a Cordilleran form (S. navigator). The taxonomic validity of S. p. brooksi is unresolved. Distribution of the three clades are consistent with vicariance and isolation in coastal, Cordilleran, and eastern refugia in the Late Pliocene or Pleistocene. The Vancouver Island subspecies S. p. brooksi is probably derived from postglacial colonization in the Late Pleistocene.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.011
Threshold uncertainty score0.021

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.196
Teacher spread0.177 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations12
Published2005
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Journal of ZoologySame topicBat Biology and Ecology StudiesFrench-language works237,207