Bibliographic record
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Childhood myositis (juvenile idiopathic inflammatory myopathies - JIIMs) is a rare, but important, group of rheumatic diseases. There has been continuing worldwide progress in the understanding of these diseases, and continuing pursuit of better therapies. We review some important contributions from the recent published literature. RECENT FINDINGS: Environmental triggers are present in the majority of children with myositis. Cancer is almost never a cause. Newer findings implicate a host of immunologic aberrations, perhaps driven by type I interferons, in addition to the humoral immunity long associated with juvenile dermatomyositis (JDM). Myositis-specific antibodies, once thought to be rare in JIIM, are now found in a significant minority because of the characterization of new antibodies. Although mortality is low, recent studies highlight the accumulation of tissue damage that occurs in JDM. Biologic therapies have an unclear place in the treatment of JIIM, but new protocols are being studied and may lead to better outcomes. Physical exercise, once controversial, likely has a role to play in treatment. SUMMARY: International work is continuing to expand our knowledge of the JIIM.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.003 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".