MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Emulsifying Properties of Fractions Prepared from Commercial Buttermilk by Microfiltration

2004· article· en· W2060914277 on OpenAlexaff
Rodrigo R. Roesch, Angela Maria Rincon, Milena Corredig

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Dairy Science · 2004
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicProteins in Food Systems
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Guelph
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCreamingMicrofiltrationChemistryChromatographyIngredientFraction (chemistry)EmulsionMembraneGlobules of fatFood scienceMilk fatBiochemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A novel method for the separation of milk-fat globule membrane (MFGM) isolate by microfiltration in the presence of citrate was applied to prepare a fraction to be used to stabilize oil-in-water emulsions. The emulsifying properties of this fraction, containing high amounts of MFGM, were compared with a buttermilk concentrate (BMC) prepared in a similar manner but still containing the original ratio of proteins (caseins, whey proteins, and MFGM). The objective of this work was to determine if the isolation procedure would result in an ingredient with different functionality when compared with BMC. These fractions were incorporated into oil-in-water emulsions at various isolate and oil concentrations. At low concentrations of isolate, MFGM emulsions showed better creaming stability and smaller oil droplet size distribution than whole buttermilk concentrate samples. The difference in stability was attributed to the compositional difference between the 2 ingredients prepared. A selective concentration of MFGM in buttermilk by microfiltration has the potential for the development of ingredients that differ substantially from the ingredients deriving from milk or whey.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.038
Threshold uncertainty score0.203

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.040
GPT teacher head0.250
Teacher spread0.210 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations84
Published2004
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Dairy ScienceSame topicProteins in Food SystemsFrench-language works237,207