MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

RECONSTRUCTION OF THE INTESTINAL LYMPHATIC DRAINAGE AFTER SMALL BOWEL TRANSPLANTATION 1

2000· article· en· W2061033206 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueTransplantation · 2000
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicLymphatic Disorders and Treatments
Canadian institutionsLondon Health Sciences Centre
Fundersnot available
KeywordsLymphatic systemMedicineTransplantationHistologySurgeryGastroenterologyUrologyInternal medicinePathology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND: The surgical procedure of small bowel transplantation normally results in complete disruption of the graft's lymphatic drainage. The present study was undertaken to determine the impact of lymphatic reconstruction (LR) on the outcome of intestinal grafting, using a microsurgical model that immediately restores lymphatic drainage. MATERIALS: Brown Norway (RT1n) intestinal grafts were orthotopically transplanted into Lewis (RT1(1)) rats either with LR (+LR) or without LR (-LR). Recipients were randomly allocated into the following groups: no treatment or cyclosporine (CsA) at a dose of 2, 5, or 10 mg/kg/day subcutaneously from postoperative day (POD) 0 to 6. RESULTS: There was morphological regeneration of lymphatics in the -LR group between 1-3 weeks as previously reported, whereas normal lymph flow was immediately restored in the +LR group. All untreated and CsA(2 mg)-treated allografts were rapidly rejected in both the +LR and -LR groups. In the groups treated with approximately 5 mg of CsA, five of six -LR animals died of chronic rejection between 38 and 86 days (mean survival time +/- SD: 76.7+/-21 days), while all +LR animals survived until death on POD 100 (P < 0.05). Histological features of mucosal damage found in -LR grafts were absent in the +LR grafts. All of the animals treated with 10 mg of CsA survived indefinitely. Sequential histology revealed mild rejection in -LR and +LR grafts on POD 45, but +LR animals had significantly higher body weight gains (POD 50: -LR: 117+/-12% vs. +LR: 136+/-4%, P < 0.01). LR did not affect donor cell migration and nutritional parameters. CONCLUSION: LR improves the long-term results of small bowel transplantation resulting in better survival rates, less mucosal damage due to chronic graft rejection, and greater weight gain. We conclude that impairment of lymph flow may contribute to poor outcomes when standard surgical techniques are used for small bowel transplantation.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.676
Threshold uncertainty score0.625

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.219
Teacher spread0.211 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it