Comparative EST analysis of a Zoophthora radicans isolate derived from Pieris brassicae and an isogenic strain adapted to Plutella xylostella
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Zoophthora radicans is an entomopathogenic fungus with the potential to be used as an insect biological control agent. To better understand the mechanisms used by Z. radicans to infect different hosts, we generated expressed sequence tag (EST) datasets from a Z. radicans strain originally isolated from Pieris brassicae, and an isogenic strain passaged through Plutella xylostella. In total, 1839 ESTs were generated which clustered into 466 contigs and 433 singletons to provide a set of 899 unique sequences. Approximately 85 % of the ESTs were significantly similar (E< or =e(-03)) to other fungal genes, of which 69.6 % encoded proteins with a reported function. Proteins involved in protein synthesis and metabolism were encoded by 38.3 % of the ESTs, while 26.3 % encoded proteins involved in cell-cycle regulation, DNA synthesis, protein fate, transport, cell defence, transcription and RNA synthesis, and 4.9 % encoded proteins associated with cellular transport, signal transduction, control of cellular organization and cell-wall degradation. Several proteinases, including aspartic proteinases, trypsins, trypsin-like serine proteases and metalloproteases, with the potential to degrade insect cuticle were expressed by the two isolates.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".