MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2061062377 · doi:10.1176/pn.44.7.0012a

Psychiatrists Urged to Work With Journalists on Reporting of Suicides

2009· article· en· W2061062377 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Mark Moran

Bibliographic record

VenuePsychiatric News · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPsychology
TopicSuicide and Self-Harm Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCopycatSuicide preventionStigma (botany)Work (physics)Public relationsMedicinePsychologyPsychiatryPoison controlPolitical scienceMedical emergencyEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Back to table of contents Previous article Next article Community NewsFull AccessPsychiatrists Urged to Work With Journalists on Reporting of SuicidesMark MoranMark MoranPublished Online:3 Apr 2009https://doi.org/10.1176/pn.44.7.0012aThe Canadian Psychiatric Association (CPA) is urging its members to collaborate with journalists and editors who are covering stories about suicide to educate them about ways of reporting that do not encourage" copycat" behavior or increase stigma.This was one of the recommendations in a policy paper titled "Media Guidelines for Reporting Suicide," in which the CPA summarized recommendations formulated by the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and the Canadian Association for Suicide Prevention (among other organizations) for journalists."Since media often call psychiatrists to comment on suicide," states the paper, "it is crucial for psychiatrists to have this knowledge readily available. These requests can be an opportunity for educating the media and ultimately saving lives.""This policy paper is intended for psychiatrists to have on hand if they get contacted by journalists," said Josh Nepon, M.D., a first-year resident at the University of Manitoba and an author of the policy paper." The take-home message is that there is solid evidence in the psychiatric literature that there are dangerous and safe ways of reporting suicide."These recommendations need to be in media hands so they can implement them," Nepon told Psychiatric News. "They will save lives."The recommendations include avoiding reporting the following:Details of the suicide methodThe word "suicide" in the headlinePhoto(s) of the deceasedThe idea that suicide is unexplainableRepetitive or excessive coverageFront page coverageRomanticized reasons for the suicideSimplistic reasons for the suicideApproval of the suicideIn contrast, the recommendations encourage journalists to convey the following when reporting a suicide: alternatives to suicide (that is, treatment); community resource information for those with suicidal ideation; examples of a positive outcome of a suicidal crisis, such as calling a suicide hotline; warning signs of suicidal behavior; and ways to approach a suicidal person.Similar recommendations have been published by the American Foundation for Suicide Prevention, in collaboration with the American Association of Suicidology, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, the National Institute of Mental Health, the Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration, the Office of the Surgeon General, and the Annenberg Public Policy Center.Nepon said there is evidence of the way journalism can influence suicide contagion. In the 1980s a rash of suicides occurred in Austria by people throwing themselves in front of subway trains; the suicides were publicized in a way that a "copycat effect" began to be obvious to policymakers and psychiatrists as well as to the media, he said.The epidemic abated after guidelines for "safe" media reporting were produced and media outlets began to monitor their reporting, Nepon said.Nepon said the CPA policy paper is an outgrowth of the Swampy Cree Suicide Prevention Team (SCSPT), led by Canadian psychiatrist Jitender Sareen, M.D. The Swampy Cree are an Aboriginal tribe in northern Manitoba. According to the Web site of the SCSPT, "Suicide, especially in Aboriginal youth, is an enormous problem in Canada. Although not well understood, Aboriginal suicidal behavior is a complex problem linked to individual, family, community, and sociocultural factors.""Media Guidelines for Reporting Suicide" is posted at . The CDC's recommendations are posted at . Recommendations by the American Foundation for Suicide Prevention are posted at .▪ ISSUES NewArchived

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.005
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.057
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Commentary · Consensus signal: Commentary
Teacher disagreement score0.245
Threshold uncertainty score0.819

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0050.057
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0040.003
Science and technology studies0.0090.002
Scholarly communication0.0070.007
Open science0.0020.005
Research integrity0.0120.011
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.2450.151

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.039
GPT teacher head0.343
Teacher spread0.305 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreCommentary

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2009
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePsychiatric NewsSame topicSuicide and Self-Harm StudiesFrench-language works237,207