MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2061068674 · doi:10.2174/1568026043387953

Sulfonamide-Based Acyclic and Conformationally Constrained MMP Inhibitors: From Computer-Assisted Design to Nanomolar Compounds

2004· review· en· W2061068674 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

VenueCurrent Topics in Medicinal Chemistry · 2004
Typereview
Languageen
FieldChemistry
TopicSynthesis and Catalytic Reactions
Canadian institutionsUniversité de Montréal
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaServier
KeywordsEnantiopure drugPyrrolidineAziridineSulfonamideChemistryHydroxamic acidCombinatorial chemistryTetrahydrofuranPeptidomimeticDocking (animal)StereochemistryEnantioselective synthesisOrganic chemistryBiochemistryMedicineRing (chemistry)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The present account relates to our studies in the computer assisted design and synthesis of acyclic and cyclic MMP inhibitors. Our early efforts focused on the preparation of cyclopropane and tetrahydrofuran-based mimics of batimastat which were not active. The discovery of subnanomolar sulfonamide-based acyclic inhibitors instigated the design of novel target compounds. Thus, with the help of a fully automated and reliable docking program, we embarked on the design and synthesis of enantiopure inhibitors incorporating cyclic scaffolds. This ultimately led to compounds exhibiting inhibitory activities in the nanomolar range. Interestingly, the qualitative ranking prediction was found to be in good agreement with the observed activities.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Other design · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.979
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.060
GPT teacher head0.322
Teacher spread0.262 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it