MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2061084722 · doi:10.4187/respcare.01183

The Effects of Low and High Tidal Volume and Pentoxifylline on Intestinal Blood Flow and Leukocyte-Endothelial Interactions in Mechanically Ventilated Rats

2011· article· en· W2061084722 on OpenAlexaff
Priscila Aikawa, Haibo Zhang, Carmen Sílvia Valente Barbas, Rogério Pazetti, Cristiano de Jesus Correia, Thaís Mauad, Eliézer Silva, Paulina Sannomiya, Luiz Francisco Poli‐de‐Figueiredo, Naomi Kondo Nakagawa

Bibliographic record

VenueRespiratory Care · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicRespiratory Support and Mechanisms
Canadian institutionsSt. Michael's Hospital
FundersFundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo
KeywordsMedicinePentoxifyllineMechanical ventilationTidal volumeAnesthesiaVentilation (architecture)Internal medicineRespiratory system

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND: The combination of high PEEP and low tidal volume (V(T)) decreases some risks of mechanical ventilation, including pulmonary overdistention, damage due to cyclic opening and closing of the alveoli, and inflammatory responses that can lead to multiple-organ dysfunction. We hypothesized that high V(T) and high PEEP induce mesenteric microcirculatory disturbances and that those disturbances would be attenuated by pentoxifylline, which is anti-inflammatory. METHODS: We anesthetized (isoflurane 1.5%), tracheostomized, and mechanically ventilated 57 male Wistar rats with PEEP of 10 cm H(2)O and F(IO(2)) of 0.21 for 2 hours. One group received low V(T) (7 mL/kg), another group received high V(T) (10 mL/kg), and a third group received high V(T) plus pentoxifylline (25 mg/kg). We measured mean arterial pressure, respiratory mechanics, mesenteric blood flow, and leukocyte-endothelial interactions. RESULTS: The mean arterial pressure was similar among the groups at baseline (108 mm Hg [IQR 94-118 mm Hg]) and after 2 hours of mechanical ventilation (104 mm Hg [IQR 90-114 mm Hg]). Mesenteric blood flow was also similar between the groups: low V(T) 15.1 mL/min (IQR 12.4-17.7 mL/min), high V(T) 11.3 mL/min (IQR 8.6-13.8 mL/min), high-V(T)/pentoxifylline 12.4 mL/min (10.8-13.7 mL/min). Peak airway pressure after 2 hours was lower (P = .03) in the low-V(T) group (10.4 cm H(2)O [IQR 10.2-10.4 cm H(2)O]) than in the high-V(T) group (12.6 cm H(2)O [10.2-14.9 cm H(2)O]) or the high-V(T)/pentoxifylline group (12.8 cm H(2)O [10.7-16.0 cm H(2)O]). There were fewer adherent leukocytes (P = .005) and fewer migrated leukocytes (P = .002) in the low-V(T) group (5 cells/100 μm length [IQR 4-7 cells/100 μm length] and 1 cell/5,000 μm(2) [IQR 1-2 cells/5,000 μm(2)], respectively) and the high-V(T)/pentoxifylline group (5 cells/100 μm length [IQR 3-10 cells/100 μm length] and 1 cell/5,000 μm(2) [IQR 1-3 cells/5,000 μm(2)], respectively) than in the high-V(T) group (14 cells/100 μm length [IQR 11-16 cells/100 μm length] and 9 cells/5,000 μm(2) [IQR 8-12 cells/5,000 μm(2)], respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Low V(T) with high PEEP was lung-protective, and early pentoxifylline reduced the inflammatory response to high V(T) with high PEEP (and presumed lung overdistention) during mechanical ventilation.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.034
Threshold uncertainty score0.611

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.251
Teacher spread0.235 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations6
Published2011
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueRespiratory CareSame topicRespiratory Support and MechanismsFrench-language works237,207