Atomic-level 2-dimensional chemical mapping and imaging of individual dopants in a phosphor crystal
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The ability to visualize and identify individual dopants, as well as measure their local physical and chemical environments in a bulk, provides deep insight for designing new functional materials and predicting their properties. However, a full understanding of dopants inside a solid has been limited by currently available characterization techniques. We demonstrate the first atomic-level 2-dimensional elemental maps of Pr dopants using the electron energy-loss spectroscopy (EELS) technique and we image Al dopants located in a lattice. Based on spectroscopic and imaging evidence we provide plausible local defect configurations of implanted Pr(+) and Al(+) ions within SrTiO3 single crystals. Our results demonstrate the detection of single Pr atoms and the formation of Al-rich nanoscale clusters ranging from 1 to 3 nm in size randomly distributed in the implanted lattice. These results provide insight into the mechanism of red light emission in doped SrTiO3.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it