MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2061229600 · doi:10.1177/0194599814556625

Microvascular Reconstruction of Segmental Mandibular Defects without Tracheostomy

2014· article· en· W2061229600 on OpenAlexaff
Sami P. Moubayed, Daniel A. Barker, Ali Razfar, Vishad Nabili, Keith E. Blackwell

Bibliographic record

VenueOtolaryngology · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicReconstructive Surgery and Microvascular Techniques
Canadian institutionsUniversité de Montréal
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineOsteoradionecrosisSurgeryFree flapTonguePerioperativeNeck dissectionOsteomyelitisGlossectomyCarcinomaRadiation therapy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

OBJECTIVE: To report our experience with mandibular resection and reconstruction using vascularized bone-containing free flaps without an elective tracheostomy. STUDY DESIGN: Case series with chart review. SETTING: Tertiary referral hospital center. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: Sixty-six patients undergoing mandibular reconstruction with vascularized bone-containing free flaps without an elective tracheostomy were identified between 1995 and 2013. We describe patient, tumor, and surgical factors and report perioperative outcomes in this population. RESULTS: Most patients underwent fibula free flap reconstruction (n = 61, 92.44%). The 4 most frequent indications for resection were osteoradionecrosis, parotid carcinoma, oral squamous cell carcinoma, and osteomyelitis. Bone defects ranging from 4.0 to 13.0 cm were reconstructed, and associated soft-tissue defects were reconstructed with skin paddle sizes ranging from 24.0 to 450.0 cm(2). There was only 1 patient with a bilateral central mandibular defect, and there were no tongue/pharyngeal soft-tissue defects or bilateral neck dissections. One case required emergent tracheostomy on postoperative day 1, and 2 more patients developed respiratory complications. There were no cases of perioperative death or flap failure. CONCLUSION: Mandibular free flap reconstruction is feasible without an elective tracheostomy in a subset of carefully selected patients without bilateral central mandibular defects, tongue/pharynx defects, or bilateral neck dissection.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Case report · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.234
Teacher spread0.227 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designCase report
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations29
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueOtolaryngologySame topicReconstructive Surgery and Microvascular TechniquesFrench-language works237,207