New Antifungal Drugs and the Pediatric Cancer Patient: Current Status of Clinical Development
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Invasive mycoses are important causes for treatment related morbidity and mortality in severely immunocompromised pediatric patients with hematological malignancies or hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. The past decade has witnessed a major expansion of antifungal drug research, which has resulted in the development of the novel class of echinocandin lipopeptides (anidulafungin, micafungin, caspofungin) and a new generation of antifungal triazoles with improved pharmacological properties (posaconazole, ravuconazole, voriconazole). Whereas caspofungin and voriconazole have been licensed in the European Union, the United States, Canada and several other countries throughout the world, posaconazole, ravuconazole, anidulafungin and micafungin are under regulatory review or in advanced stages of clinical development. Caspofungin and voriconazole are increasingly prescribed in pediatric patients, although pediatric dosage finding and safety evaluations have not been completed. This article reviews the clinical pharmacology of the new antifungal agents and the status of their clinical development in immunocompromised pediatric patients.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.004 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".