Radiative recombination mechanisms in individual wurtzite ZnSe nanowires with a defect-free single-crystalline microstructure
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Photoluminescence (PL) spectroscopy performed on arrays of semiconductor nanowires (NWs) suffers from ensemble broadening of PL lines, and fails to separate the PL from NWs of different crystal structures in the ensemble. Even the results on PL from single NWs are not devoid of ambiguity. This is because the influence of structural defects in NWs, such as stacking faults, twin boundaries and dislocations, on their optical spectra cannot be accounted for since the structural characteristics of the same NW remain largely unknown. We performed low-temperature PL spectroscopy on individual wurtzite (WZ) ZnSe NWs, and confirmed a homogeneous single-crystalline microstructure without any extended defects in these NWs, thus excluding any role of structural imperfections in their optical spectra. The luminescence is shown to be dominated solely by native point defects, while no role of extrinsic impurities was found. The radiative recombination is shown to originate from excitons bound to vacancies of Zn (VZn), VZn-complexes, and their phonon replicas. The binding energies of the acceptor-bound excitons, ionization energies of the acceptors, and average number of phonons emitted for shallow donor-VZn acceptor pair related transition were determined. Distinct from previous studies on PL from arrays of ZnSe NWs, this work provides an unambiguous interpretation of the PL spectra and assignment of PL peaks to WZ ZnSe. Narrow excitonic emission of linewidths 2.9 meV indicate excellent optical quality of WZ ZnSe NWs.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".