Conserved WCPL and CX4C Domains Mediate Several Mating Adhesin Interactions in<i>Saccharomyces cerevisiae</i>
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Several adhesins are induced by pheromones during mating in Saccharomyces cerevisiae, including Aga1p, Aga2p, Sag1p (Agalpha1p), and Fig2p. These four proteins all participate in or influence a well-studied agglutinin interaction mediated by Aga1p-Aga2p complexes and Sag1p; however, they also play redundant and essential roles in mating via an unknown mechanism. Aga1p and Fig2p both contain repeated, conserved WCPL and CX(4)C domains. This study was directed toward understanding the mechanism underlying the collective requirement of agglutinins and Fig2p for mating. Apart from the well-known agglutinin interaction between Aga2p and Sag1p, three more pairs of interactions in cells of opposite mating type were revealed by this study, including bilateral heterotypic interactions between Aga1p and Fig2p and a homotypic interaction between Fig2p and Fig2p. These four pairs of adhesin interactions are collectively required for maximum mating efficiency and normal zygote morphogenesis. GPI-less, epitope-tagged forms of Aga1p and Fig2p can be co-immunoprecipitated from the culture medium of mating cells in a manner dependent on the WCPL and CX(4)C domains in the R1 repeat of Aga1p. Using site-directed mutagenesis, the conserved residues in Aga1p that interact with Fig2p were identified. Aga1p is involved in two distinct adhesive functions that are independent of each other, which raises the possibility for combinatorial interactions of this protein with its different adhesion receptors, Sag1 and Fig2p, a property of many higher eukaryotic adhesins.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".