MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2061259593 · doi:10.1042/bst0360072

AAA+ proteins: diversity in function, similarity in structure

2008· review· en· W2061259593 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueBiochemical Society Transactions · 2008
Typereview
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicCellular transport and secretion
Canadian institutionsCanada Research ChairsUniversity of TorontoUniversity of New Brunswick
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSUPERFAMILYAAA proteinsComputational biologyContext (archaeology)BiologyStructural similarityFunction (biology)Evolutionary biologyLineage (genetic)Functional diversityStructural Classification of Proteins databaseGeneticsProtein structureATPaseBiochemistryEnzymeGeneEcology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The AAA+ (ATPases associated with various cellular activities) superfamily of proteins represents a distinct lineage of the larger class of P-loop NTPases. Members of this superfamily use the power of nucleotide binding and hydrolysis to direct molecular remodelling events. All AAA+ proteins share a common core architecture, which, through various sequence and structural modifications, has been adapted for use in a remarkably diverse range of functions. The following mini-review provides a concise description of the major structural elements common to all AAA+ proteins in the context of their mechanistic roles. In addition, the evolutionary and functional diversity of this superfamily is described on the basis of recent classification studies.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Research integrity
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.987
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.025
GPT teacher head0.252
Teacher spread0.227 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it