MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2061263496 · doi:10.1037/h0087249

Identity Maintenance and Loss: Concurrent Processes Among the Fransaskois.

2005· article· en· W2061263496 on OpenAlexaffvenueabout
Sophie Gaudet, Richard Clément

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Behavioural Science/Revue canadienne des sciences du comportement · 2005
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicCanadian Identity and History
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Ottawa
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPsychologyIdentity (music)Social psychologyPsychoanalysisDevelopmental psychology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

La recherche a demontre que, chez les membres d'un groupe minoritaire, il existe une tendance a adopter les caracteristiques de l'exogroupe au prix de la perte des elements culturels de l'endogroupe. Toutefois, dans d'autres etudes, on a observe la presence d'une revitalisation culturelle et du maintien des caracteristiques ethniques. Tandis que les theories actuelles des relations intergroupes delimitent les conditions sous lesquelles l'une et l'autre se produisent, aucune ne s'est penchee sur les processus responsables de leur co-occurrence. La presente etude a donc pour objectif d'examiner si l'effet de perte et de maintien de l'identite culturelle peut se produire en meme temps et a identifier le mecanisme qui l'entraine. Deux dimensions de l'acculturation (identite ethnique et ajustement), ainsi que les aspects initiaux du contact defini par la communication et les processus de soutien social, ont ete examines chez des Canadiens francais vivant dans une province de l'Ouest. Des etudiants du secondaire et des etudiants du premier cycle (N = 151) qui frequentent des ecoles francophones ont participe a l'etude. Comme nous l'avions predit, l'importance du contact, du soutien social et de l'aisance a utiliser la langue seconde dans le faconnement de l'identite et de l'ajustement d'une personne a ete demontree. Bien qu'on ait observe une tendance soustractive causee par l'apprentissage d'une langue seconde, les avantages additifs du maintien de l'identite et du bien-etre etaient egalement apparents.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.013
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: Qualitative
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.933
Threshold uncertainty score0.132

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.013
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0060.003
Scholarly communication0.0040.002
Open science0.0010.004
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.053
GPT teacher head0.254
Teacher spread0.201 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations50
Published2005
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Journal of Behavioural Science/Revue canadienne des sciences du comportementSame topicCanadian Identity and HistoryFrench-language works237,207