Experimental investigation and modeling of diffusion in the InP/(In,Ga)As heterostructures
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The interdiffusion of lattice-matched InP/(In,Ga)As superlattice structures (nominally undoped, p-doped and n-doped) has been studied by analytical electron microscopy (x-ray analysis) using a field emission gun, scanning transmission electron microscope. The point-spread function of the electron beam was used to correct the experimental data (obtained as x-ray maps, 50×50 nm in area) in order to derive diffusion profiles of the group V elements (As, P) after annealing. The results, showing a marked asymmetry in the As profiles after annealing, are interpreted using a model based on the coherent diffusion of the group III and V elements on their own sublattices, each of which is treated as a regular solution. A mathematical procedure, based on the minimization of the difference between the measured and predicted concentration profiles, is employed to compute the two lattice-specific composition-dependent velocities from the experimental diffusion profiles. A good agreement is found between the experimental measurements and the predictions of the model. The role of coherency strains in the interdiffusion process is discussed.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".