The reductive activation of the antitumor drug RH1 to its semiquinone free radical by NADPH cytochrome P450 reductase and by HCT116 human colon cancer cells
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
RH1 (2,5-diaziridinyl-3-(hydroxymethyl)-6-methyl-1,4-benzoquinone), which is currently in clinical trials, is a diaziridinyl benzoquinone bioreductive anticancer drug that was designed to be activated by the obligate two-electron reductive enzyme NAD(P)H quinone oxidoreductase 1 (NQO1). In this electron paramagnetic resonance (EPR) study we showed that RH1 was reductively activated by the one-electron reductive enzyme NADPH cytochrome P450 reductase and by a suspension of HCT116 human colon cancer cells to yield a semiquinone free radical. As shown by EPR spin trapping experiments RH1 was reductively activated by cytochrome P450 reductase and underwent redox cycling to produce damaging hydroxyl radicals in reactions that were both H2O2- and iron-dependent. Thus, reductive activation by cytochrome P450 reductase or other reductases to produce a semiquinone that can redox cycle to produce damaging hydroxyl radicals and/or DNA-reactive alkylating species may contribute to the potent cell growth inhibitory effects of RH1. These results also suggest that selection of patients for treatment with RH1 based on their expression levels of NQO1 may be problematic.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it